The DGMM will implement the mandatory “nautical V16 beacon” starting in 2027

The Directorate General of the Merchant Navy, in collaboration with the DGT and various maritime administrations, is reportedly considering the introduction of a V16 beacon specifically for the nautical sector, which would become mandatory for recreational vessels starting in 2027, according to sources close to the organization.

The device, provisionally named V16-Mar, would operate similarly to the land-based V16 system: 360° visible flashing light, automatic activation in case of breakdown, and transmission of the vessel’s position to a centralized platform, from which Maritime Rescue, the Harbour Master’s Office, and navigation apps would be notified.

If the measure is confirmed, pyrotechnic flares and manual signaling devices would not be completely excluded from regulations according to the leaked draft, despite being considered “obsolete and potentially dangerous” by sailor associations consulted.

The new beacon should be placed in an elevated area of the vessel, preferably atop the mast or on the radar arch, and would not require connection to mobile devices, as it would incorporate its own satellite transmission system.

Connectivity included… for 12 years

One of the points generating the most debate in the sector is that the beacon would include mandatory connectivity for 12 years, built into the purchase price of the device, which would be around €180 depending on the vessel’s length. Slightly more expensive than the DGT V16, but understandably so considering it’s a nautical device, same material, higher price.

Authorities argue that this connectivity would improve safety in high-traffic nautical areas, reduce emergency response times, and provide “a global view of recreational maritime traffic.”

Statements from the Maritime Service

In this context, Francisco Córdoba, director of the Civil Guard Maritime Service in the Balearic Islands, reportedly stated that the initiative “responds to a clear need to modernize maritime alert systems.”

“In many interventions we arrive late simply because nobody knows exactly where the boat is. If a beacon can transmit its exact position automatically, we're talking about significant progress in maritime safety,” he reportedly explained.

Córdoba also aimed to reassure the sector, stating that “this is not about monitoring sailors, but about locating an emergency when it truly occurs,” noting that the system would only activate in breakdown or risk situations.

Additionally, he detailed that the system would allow emergency alerts to be cross-checked with real-time navigation conditions, such as maritime traffic, weather, or sensitive anchoring areas.

“It’s not only about knowing where a vessel is, but contextualizing the incident. With this data, resources could be prioritized, unnecessary deployments avoided, and system efficiency improved,” he added.

According to the same sources, the information generated by the beacon could eventually be integrated with digital charts, nautical apps, and port management systems, always “respecting current regulations and being used exclusively in emergency situations.”

Mixed reactions within the nautical sector

As expected, the news has sparked mixed opinions among boat owners, skippers, and maritime professionals. While some welcome improvements in safety, others question the real need for the system, its economic impact, and mandatory geolocation.

“We’re not against safety, but this is starting to look more like control than assistance,” commented a professional skipper who wished to remain anonymous.

Environmental labels for sailing in LEZs

At the same time, according to the same sources, the administration is also considering an environmental label system for recreational boats, similar to the one used in major cities for road traffic.

These labels would regulate access and navigation in certain LEZs (Low Emission Zones) in environmentally sensitive areas, such as natural parks, bays with high nautical pressure, or zones near urban centers. Classification would take into account engine type, engine age, emissions, and auxiliary onboard systems.

Technical sources indicate that the aim would not be prohibition, but organization—limiting access during episodes of high maritime traffic and giving priority to more efficient or alternative-propulsion vessels.

This line of work is reportedly still “in a very early phase,” but follows regulatory trends already applied on land in recent years.

Calm from Passion for the Sea

From Passion for the Sea we want to send a message of calm: for now, no regulation has been approved and everything is still in preliminary study. We also want to thank, once again, the trust and support of our followers who accompany us daily. And yes, it’s December 28th, and this news might just be an Innocents’ Day prank (Spanish equivalent to April Fools’). Though we hope we haven’t given away too many hints... especially considering the direction things have been going lately for sailors, and society in general, where what seemed unthinkable yesterday often ends up becoming regulation today.